More Pages: New Britain Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15


Mountain Biking in New South Wales

Did not know that!

Brilliant analysis of media during Falklands warThe Thatcher Government portrayed its decision to fight, and its conduct of the campaign, as expressions of the essential national character, the 'true Britain'. The mass media at once swung into line. In fact, the war primarily served a purpose hostile to the nation, Thatcher's political survival.
Government and media equated Argentina's initial recovery of the Islands with the Nazi invasion of Poland, as they immediately identified the war with the Second World War, and Thatcher with Churchill. They saw the Falklands as the image of Britain, a ravished island Eden. They ignored the harsher similarities, of economic dependence, under-investment and social inequality.
The media depended on the military for information, which turned the journalists into what one called 'troopie groupies'. The media became a single, responsible voice speaking for 'our common cause'. According to their account, 'our' Government never faltered, 'our' flawless heroes carried out a perfect campaign. On the other side, their corrupt, undemocratic Government and its murderous thugs waged a campaign of Latin incompetence.
The war was supposedly unavoidable. There was no alternative; the British Government, guileless innocent in a naughty world, was forced into war by the Satanic enemy. Our supreme temptation was the serpent 'appeasement', diplomacy a cunning trap set by wily foreigners. Peace demonstrators were described as pro-fascist, dissenters as collaborators. In practice, this meant rejecting in principle all ceasefire proposals and negotiations; it meant war without compromise. The only acceptable ethical outcome was the enemy's total surrender.
Government and media celebrated the war as the source of national salvation, even, in Thatcher's memoirs, of world salvation. War was rebirth, welfare, humanitarianism.
This presentation of the Falklands war has become the media model for all subsequent wars. Kevin Foster's book is a model of sanity; its publication now is especially timely.


Great History

The City and the House of LordsThey demonstrate how the main Imperial and Overseas investors in are the British upper class while City professionals and middle class invest mainly in Britain and Europe. The City was used to channel British old money across the globe.
Main beneficiaries of those imperial and overseas investments are people with political power, the Lords. These in turn shape British imperial policies to fit their investments, building the British Empire along it.
But all locations are not equally influenced by them. Canadian financial markets in the interwar period for instance move according to interest rate of the dollar and pound. If dollar interest rate is lower than pound interest rate, then American influence is larger in Canada. Otherwise British influence dominates.
A detailed study about relation betweens upper classes and imperialism even if authors focused their attention on relations between the City and British Aristocracy adequatly naming it 'Gentlemanly Capitalism'.


The Glasgow GuideWe enjoyed Glasgow in ways never anticipated and this excellent guide was the reason.


A seminal study of halfway houses in Great Britian.

If you like history . . .

Last Of the Nineteenth Century Officers

Higher Education in a Post-Binary EraThe chapters making up the three system-specific sections are written by authors with different perspectives - one from the government/system level and two from the institutions' perspective in each section. These are well related to each other and the general theme of national higher education reform by the editor Prof David Teather in his introduction and conclusions.
I commend the book to anyone interested in how university systems develop and the responses of governments and institutions to demands for change and reform in higher education.